US must be firm in its support for Taiwanese
By Chen Ching-chih陳清池
Saturday, Sep 04, 2004,Page 8

Since President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was re-elected, the Chinese government has escalated threats to use force against Taiwan. The People's Liberation Army has also staged mock invasion exercises against the nation.

Employing political and economic leverage, Beijing has pressured other countries such as Singapore and Australia not to side with Taiwan if China attacks.

It is no wonder that the Taiwan Strait has emerged, in the opinion of some analysts, as Asia's most dangerous flashpoint. Taking advantage of the US preoccupation with Iraq, the emboldened Beijing government has warned the US that it will pay a high price if it were to assist Taiwan militarily when China attacks the island.

The brazen threat appears to have succeeded in weakening the will of some US leaders in their support for Taiwan.

The most telling sign of such a change of heart is the Democratic Party's failure to reaffirm its 2000 party platform pledge to support Taiwan in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act during its recent convention in Boston.

Since its adoption in 1979, the Taiwan Relations Act has been instrumental in preserving peace and stability in the Strait.

The law's important security provisions have been reiterated and reaffirmed by the US congressional resolutions on many occasions.

The executive branch has also faithfully abided by the law.

For example, former US president Bill Clinton dispatched two aircraft carrier battle groups to local waters shortly after China launched missiles over the country in the early spring of 2000.

And, in his effort to make crystal clear the US position, President George W. Bush publicly pledged "to do whatever it takes to help Taiwan defend itself" in April 2001 and approved the sale of major defensive weapons to Taiwan.

The US has paid dearly for occasional ambiguity in its post-WWII foreign policy.

It was the US' uncommitted position on the defense of South Korea in the late 1940s that emboldened Communist North Korea to invade South Korea in June1950.

And again it was the same ambiguity that emboldened former president Saddam Hussein's Iraq to attack Kuwait in August 1990.

To insure peace and stability in the Strait, the US therefore cannot afford to be ambiguous.
A bellicose China is a threat to peace and stability in East Asia as well as to democratic Taiwan.

Alarmed by China's military build-up, Russia and Japan, for example, have joined the US in opposing the EU's proposed lifting of their arms sales ban on China, a sanction imposed on Beijing after China's use of force to crush pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square in June 1989.

Japan's steady move to upgrade its self-defense forces and strengthen its military ties with the US is also a logical response to the rising military power of its increasingly nationalistic and major Asian rival.

In short, China can only be dissuaded from attacking Taiwan when it knows for sure that the US is unambiguous on the issue of aiding Taiwan.

With the planned US redeployment of ground troops in Asia and Europe, the Beijing decision-makers might be inclined to misjudge US determination in protecting its national interest overseas, particularly in Asia.

It is thus essential that the US is not ambiguous in its stand to defend Taiwan.

It is consequently reassuring to learn that the Republican Party adopted on Aug. 30 a party platform in which it made unmistakably clear that the US will aid Taiwan in accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act if it is attacked by China.

Chen Ching-chih is professor emeritus of history at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.